Lamar archer & cofrin llp
WebbSince its founding in 1982, Lamar, Archer & Cofrin, LLP has specialized in complex civil litigation of all types and commercial real estate. “AV” rated by Martindale Hubbell * for … WebbSince its founding in 1982, Lamar, Archer & Cofrin, LLP has represented clients in complex civil litigation and commercial real estate. Top rated, "AV" rated by Martindale …
Lamar archer & cofrin llp
Did you know?
Webb17 apr. 2024 · In this case, the Supreme Court will determine whether R. Scott Appling’s debt to Lamar, Archer & Cofrin, LLP is dischargeable in Appling’s bankruptcy proceedings. Between 2004 and 2005, Appling accumulated a debt of $60,000 to the law firm for legal services, evading collection attempts by saying that he soon expected a … WebbUtilizing their experience, Lamar, Archer & Cofrin’s attorneys are able to streamline their representation of clients and deliver the highest quality legal work at costs well below that of larger firms. ... Lamar, Archer & Cofrin, LLP 191 Peachtree St., NE Suite 805 Atlanta, Georgia 30303 404/577.1777.
Webb3 juli 2024 · Mr. Scott Appling hired a law firm – Lamar, Archer & Cofrin LLP (Lamar) – to represent him in business litigation. After Appling fell behind on his legal bills (more than $60,000), Lamar threatened to withdraw as counsel. Appling told Lamar that he was expecting a $100,000 tax refund and would use such refund to pay Lamar. WebbR. Scott Appling retained Lamar, Archer & Cofrin, LLP (Lamar) to represent him in a lawsuit. He did not pay Lamar's fees on time, leaving an outstanding bill of more than $60,000. When Lamar asked for payment, Appling said that he was anticipating a tax refund of $100,000 that he would use to cover the outstanding fees and any new fees.
WebbLamar Archer & Cofrin, LLP, Atlanta, Georgia. 1 like. Lawyer & Law Firm WebbMr. Lamar has successfully defended many multi-million dollar claims and obtained numerous seven figure recoveries on behalf of his clients. Prior to founding Lamar, …
http://www.laclaw.net/attorneys.html
Webb18 apr. 2024 · The U.S. Supreme Court heard oral argument yesterday in Lamar, Archer & Cofrin, LLP v.Appling, a case from the 11th Circuit regarding the bankruptcy dischargeability exceptions in 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(2).Locally, Appling is important because it originated across the street–literally–in Chief Bankruptcy Judge James P. Smith’s … lows order invoiceWebb6 juli 2024 · Lamar, Archer & Cofrin, LLP v. Appling, 138 S.Ct. 1752, 1761 (2024). Having denied the IAA’s motion, the Bankruptcy Court declined to address whether the IAA’s motion was a motion for relief ... jay farrar vs jeff tweedyjay fearhttp://www.laclaw.net/attorneys.html low sorb tubing drugsWebb10 apr. 2024 · This case arises from a dispute between Lamar, Archer & Cofrin, LLP, an Atlanta law firm, and one of its former clients, R. Scott Appling. Like many bankruptcy disputes, this one involves questionable financial and strategic choices by both parties. jayfbc.twotimtwo.comWebb5 juni 2024 · The facts of the case are relatively straightforward. The law firm of Lamar, Archer & Cofrin, LLP (the “Firm”) represented R. Scott Appling (“Appling”) in business litigation. Appling fell behind in payment of his legal bills, and the Firm threatened to withdraw as his counsel and to place a lien on its work product until it was paid. jay farner twitterWebb24 jan. 2024 · In the Supreme Court, unanimously won a statutory interpretation question involving the Bankruptcy Act (Lamar, Archer & Cofrin, LLP v.Appling, 2024)*; In the Supreme Court, won a 9-0 favorable decision regarding the construction of the Prison Litigation Reform Act, leading to victory on remand (Ross v.Blake, 2016)*; In the … lows orkney ltd